Annotated screenshots
The report should point at the actual weak block, not just describe it abstractly. Hero, CTA, trust proof, form, and friction zones should be visibly marked.
Landing Page Grader Reports
Reports should prove where the page leaks, not just restate the score.
This surface defines what a serious Landing Page Grader deliverable looks like: visual evidence, rewrite direction, priority, and a cleaner bridge into implementation. Payments are still off, but the report anatomy is already pinned down.
Tool ecosystem
Landing Page Grader now has its own audit, pricing, reports, sample, and page-scan surfaces. The same tool shell now carries the live path from free diagnosis to paid report depth.
Why it hurts conversion
Every annotation should explain what it breaks: click confidence, message match, trust timing, form completion, or action momentum.
Rewrite direction
The tool should not only say what is weak. It should suggest how to rewrite or restructure the block so the page becomes clearer and heavier.
Implementation bridge
The report must end in execution logic: what to fix first, what can wait, and when done-for-you implementation makes more sense than another self-serve pass.
Report structure
Hard verdict: why the landing page feels strong, weak, leaking, or broken.
Component scores for message clarity, CTA logic, trust timing, friction, and mobile readiness.
Top 3 to 5 conversion leaks with severity, impact, and fix priority.
Annotated screenshot pack with redesign direction.
Execution sequence that can feed directly into implementation.