Annotated screenshots
The report should point at the actual weak block, not just describe it abstractly. Hero, CTA, trust proof, form, and friction zones should be visibly marked.
Landing Page Grader Reports
Landing Page Grader reports show exactly where the page leaks.
LeadRevive product surface
This surface defines what a serious Landing Page Grader deliverable looks like: visual evidence, rewrite direction, priority, and a cleaner bridge into implementation inside the same canonical flow.
Canonical funnel
landing-page-grader -> result/paywall -> checkout -> success is the only product funnel. Pricing, reports, sample, and page-scan support that same path. SEO routes can feed the grader, but they do not open a second funnel.
EntryResult / PaywallCheckoutSuccess
One live path
Keep the next action tied to the grader.
Use the guide for context, then move into the live grader for the real verdict. Pricing stays visible, but secondary.
Why it hurts conversion
Every annotation should explain what it breaks: click confidence, message match, trust timing, form completion, or action momentum.
Rewrite direction
The tool should not only say what is weak. It should suggest how to rewrite or restructure the block so the page becomes clearer and heavier.
Implementation bridge
The report must end in execution logic: what to fix first, what can wait, and when done-for-you implementation makes more sense than another self-serve pass.
Report structure
Hard verdict: why the landing page feels strong, weak, leaking, or broken.
Component scores for message clarity, CTA logic, trust timing, friction, and mobile readiness.
Top 3 to 5 conversion leaks with severity, impact, and fix priority.
Annotated screenshot pack with redesign direction.
Execution sequence that can feed directly into implementation.